Spokeo decision leads to dismissal of proposed FCRA class action
Tags : FCRA Compliance
A New Jersey federal judge tossed the class-action lawsuit against Michaels Stores, Inc., citing the prior U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
The plaintiffs in the case claimed that Michaels failed to provide sufficient disclosures that the store intended to procure background checks on job applicants, as required by the FCRA.
However, a U.S. District Judge found that the plaintiffs – who were all hired by Michaels – lacked standing as they could not demonstrate they suffered concrete harm.
In Spokeo, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that in order to have standing to bring such a case, plaintiffs must have suffered a concrete and particularized injury – a requirement that is not automatically satisfied by allegations of a mere statutory violation.
"Plaintiffs allege a violation of what I have called the purely formal requirements of FCRA," the New Jersey federal judge ruled. “They do not factually allege any harm aside from the statutory violation itself."
Source: Law360.com, 1/25/2017
We cannot express enough how much we have enjoyed working with BIG! It has really benefitted our processing and ease of doing business!
I enjoy collaborating with BIG, and know that if I have to reach out with a question/concern, a positive attitude with a willingness to find resolve is on the other side of an email or a phone call.
You have been the most professional and most helpful business partner that I have ever been associated with — always there to assist us and with rapid turnaround times.
I am confident whenever we add a product with your company that I will have a good experience.
We have received superior service and we know this is what you and your team strive for. We are grateful for the dedication, level of professionalism and effort shown.