Ohio appeals court dismisses FCRA class action, cites Spokeo
Tags : FCRA Compliance
Noting the ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Spokeo, the Court of Appeals of Ohio stated that plaintiffs in the case of Smith et al v. The Ohio State University pleaded no particularized injury-in-fact and thus lacked standing to pursue their claims.
The plaintiffs in the class claimed that Ohio State violated the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act when the university provided job applicants with improper background check disclosure forms. The plaintiffs were hired by the University but claimed that they suffered harm because their privacy was invaded and they were misled as to their rights under the FCRA.
Ultimately, the state appellate court declined to adopt a "statutory standing" doctrine in Ohio that would allow standing for a federal statutory claim without the existence of an alleged injury-in-fact.
The case is Smith et al v. The Ohio State University, No. 2:2015cv03030 - Document 27 (S.D. Ohio 2016).
Source: Troutman Sanders, 12/8/2017
We cannot express enough how much we have enjoyed working with BIG! It has really benefitted our processing and ease of doing business!
I enjoy collaborating with BIG, and know that if I have to reach out with a question/concern, a positive attitude with a willingness to find resolve is on the other side of an email or a phone call.
You have been the most professional and most helpful business partner that I have ever been associated with — always there to assist us and with rapid turnaround times.
I am confident whenever we add a product with your company that I will have a good experience.
We have received superior service and we know this is what you and your team strive for. We are grateful for the dedication, level of professionalism and effort shown.