Judge refuses to toss background check suit against USPS

A Wisconsin federal judge found that an applicant who claims the U.S. Postal Service failed to give him an adequate amount of time to dispute the information returned on his background check sufficiently alleged an injury.

USPS procured a background check on plaintiff Rondo Tyus through a third-party background screening firm. The results of the background check included information stating that Tyus was jailed for a 2011 misdemeanor (the sentence was stayed) and also incorrectly labeled a prior ordinance violation as “criminal in nature.” Furthermore, the background check provider reported that Tyus failed to admit to any prior criminal convictions when he had in fact admitted to the misdemeanor conviction on his job application.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, applicants are supposed to be given five business days to dispute or explain the findings of their background check, but Tyus said that USPS denied his application after only three days.

USPS argued that it rejected Tyus’ application for reasons other than the criminal record inaccuracies reported on his background check, and thus the window for disputing the aforementioned items was irrelevant.

Ultimately, the judge ruled that the inaccuracies on the report may still have swayed USPS’s decision to hire the plaintiff.

“While USPS contends that its error did not matter, the court cannot conclude that it is implausible that the inaccuracies in the consumer report may have affected USPS’s decision,” the judge wrote in his decision.

The case is Rondo Tyus et al. v. United States Postal Service, case number 15-cv-1467, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Source:, 6/20/2017

Thank you for your interest in Business Information Group. We have received your message and will contact you in one business day or less.
You have exceeded the number of attempts to submit this form. As a result, your IP address has been temporarily blocked.

Get In Touch

Send a Message *fields required

What are your Interests?optional

Contact Information

Even our RFP PROCESS is state-of-the-art.

Take a look

What our clients are saying

We cannot express enough how much we have enjoyed working with BIG! It has really benefitted our processing and ease of doing business!

Licensing and Registration Manager
Investment and Insurance Company

I enjoy collaborating with BIG, and know that if I have to reach out with a question/concern, a positive attitude with a willingness to find resolve is on the other side of an email or a phone call.

Human Resources Administrator
Global Financial Services Firm

You have been the most professional and most helpful business partner that I have ever been associated with — always there to assist us and with rapid turnaround times.

Principal Consultant
Major Professional Services Network

I am confident whenever we add a product with your company that I will have a good experience.

Division Manager
Insurance and Financial Services Agency

We have received superior service and we know this is what you and your team strive for. We are grateful for the dedication, level of professionalism and effort shown.

Large Insurance Agency

You are leaving

Ok, Continue Cancel